• DMCA
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Whitelist
Monday, May 23, 2022
Survival Society
  • Home
  • Naval Survival
  • Land Survival
  • Survival Strategy
  • Defense
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Naval Survival
  • Land Survival
  • Survival Strategy
  • Defense
No Result
View All Result
Survival Society
No Result
View All Result

‘Time To Change Our Future’: Thurgood Pledges Army Acquisition Speed, Transparency – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

wbstadm by wbstadm
August 12, 2021
in Land Survival
0
‘Time To Change Our Future’: Thurgood Pledges Army Acquisition Speed, Transparency – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

Lt. Gen. Neil Thurgood

WASHINGTON: Being transparent. Moving fast. Letting soldiers instead of engineers guide a weapon’s development. Tackle a “wicked hard problem” — like completing a hypersonic system — and get it done and fielded in five years.

For the last 20 years almost no one would expect to have heard those words — or seen that likely result — from an Army habitually ineffective and slow at designing and fielding weapons.

One of the prime drivers behind these changes is Lt. Gen. Neil Thurgood, the Army’s director for hypersonics, directed energy, space and rapid acquisition. His position was created to drive the Army forward in these key areas.

With China and Russia apparently ahead on hypersonics and some other key military capabilities, Thurgood said Wednesday at the Space and Missile Defense conference in Huntsville, Ala. that speed and effectiveness are of the essence.

“We had these great things we could do really fast in the 1940s and 50s. And then, somewhere across that time, we lost that capability in our nation. And I’m here today to tell you that our future is not our past,” Thurgood said. “It’s time to change our future, and we change our future by how we behave. And we can do hard things, we can be successful at wicked hard problems.”

The best example of the qualities of transparency and speed from the general’s speech is also arguably the hardest technical problem facing the US military: building an effective hypersonic weapon. The Army version is known as the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW).

As work began on the LRHW program, Thurgood was given a stark and simple mandate.

“In 2019, the Secretary of the Army called me into his office with a gentleman named Bob Strider,” the deputy director of the Army’s Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office,” Thurgood said. “And he said, ‘Neil. I want you to deliver an offensive hypersonic weapon at the battery level and field it by FY 23. What are your questions?’ That’s the order. It wasn’t more complicated than that. I said, ‘hello sir. I got it. I’ll go figure something out.’”

And transparency? There were six companies key to the early stages of the hypersonics push. Here’s what happened at the first meeting they had with Thurgood.

“And I said, ‘I want to see you, I want you [industry] to present all of your financials and all of your schedules. Here in front of everybody.’ And you can imagine,” Thurgood said, “that conversation was pretty shocking. The first time didn’t go that great, quite frankly; it was a little concerning. And I said, ‘Look, how we’re going to do business is totally different. If you want to, if you want to behave like the past [then] your future will be your past. If you want your future to be different then don’t behave like we did in the past.”

And when the Army meets to discuss the program, Thurgood said: “So, they come to my program management review, they sit in my office, in my decision meetings. We are 100% transparent with our industry partners and we expect the same from them.”

The two sides share budget documents and more, he explained. “We are totally transparent with our budget documents. And they’re transparent. We have an integrated master schedule, integrated EVMS Earned Value Management System across six companies.”

Lockheed Martin concept art for its LRHW offering.

From the Army’s side, soldiers have been involved in the programs the general oversees from the very beginning.

“You don’t design it with engineers. You design it with soldier engineers at the very beginning of the problem set, not halfway through. We call that soldier-centered design,” he said.

More broadly, the Army’s Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office scours the defense and commercial industry, along with academia, for new ideas and tries to get them moving fast.

The office issues an annual white paper on major issues for the Army, in hopes of getting new ideas from outside the department. The first time they got 187 expressions of interest. The Army picked 32, who came in to do an oral presentation.

“We just did one in Atlanta with Georgia Tech. We paired with to Georgia Tech to do this,” Thurgood said. “And we selected nine companies out of the over 200 that replied to the request, and, and they’ll be under contract, and matter of fact, the first two of those will be under contract before the end of this month. That’s wicked fast from an idea that industry has.” Most of the companies are small non-traditional companies that have never worked with the government, but “they have these great ideas,” he said. “And so we’ve tried to create for our Army and for our nation a mechanism for you to get those good ideas to us.”

But is it working? Can the Army really deliver on a broader acquisition front?

“The jury is still out,” says Bill Greenwalt, a top defense acquisition experts who while a staffer on the Senate Armed Services Committee wrote many of the laws which now guide Thurgood.

“It is heartening to finally hear from someone in a senior leadership position in the Army that it is trying to innovate like America once did. Still, understanding our history is one thing— convincing the phalanx of historically illiterate naysayers from the appropriations committees on down is another,” Greenwalt wrote in an email. “The key factor to measure success will be whether Lt. Gen. Thurgood is given enough rope to succeed. Then, of course, he actually has to deliver in the limited time frame he will be in his position.”

Will Congress and the Army give him “enough funding and managerial flexibility to pick winners at scale? Will he truly innovate like we did in the 1950s, which means delivering operational capability in the two to five years that this nation once routinely used to do?

“Otherwise, he risks raising expectations and creating a new crop of small businesses who are all given door prizes for participation but no real path to compete against entrenched interests who, frankly, have better lobbyists than any new entrant (no matter how good their technology is) ever will.”



Source
‘Time To Change Our Future’: Thurgood Pledges Army Acquisition Speed, Transparency – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense is written by Colin Clark for breakingdefense.com

Tags: Above the Lawabovethelaw.comacquisition reformArmy Futures Commandassociate salariesbiglawblawgclerkshipsDeck-Wagner Army Acquisition ReviewGen. Neil Thurgoodjudgeslaw clerkslaw firm newslaw firm rankingslaw firm salarieslaw schoolslawyer bloglegal bloglegal gossiplegal newslegal scandallegal tabloidpartner salariesprofits per partner listSMD 2021
Previous Post

To Make Up For Years Of Slow Policy Decisions, MDA Needs More Cash – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

Next Post

Army Awards Contract For Major Crypto Update – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

Next Post
Army Awards Contract For Major Crypto Update – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

Army Awards Contract For Major Crypto Update - Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Categories

  • Defense
  • Land Survival
  • Naval Survival
  • Survival Strategy
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Army modernization programs need to put ‘points on the board’: Acquisition chief – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

Army modernization programs need to put ‘points on the board’: Acquisition chief – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

February 17, 2022
Lockheed Martin walks away from $4.4B Aerojet Rocketdyne acquisition – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

Lockheed Martin walks away from $4.4B Aerojet Rocketdyne acquisition – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

February 14, 2022
Starting Seeds, The Easy And Smart Way Off The Grid News

Starting Seeds, The Easy And Smart Way Off The Grid News

March 11, 2022
China’s Third Aircraft Carrier Takes Shape: CSIS – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

China’s Third Aircraft Carrier Takes Shape: CSIS – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

June 16, 2021
After DoD’s $1.5B move, Army and Marines rush to buy new Javelins, Stingers

After DoD’s $1.5B move, Army and Marines rush to buy new Javelins, Stingers

0
Workplace Hate Crimes | Carol Cambridge

Workplace Hate Crimes | Carol Cambridge

0
Situational Awareness | Carol Cambridge

Situational Awareness | Carol Cambridge

0
Survival Mindset vs. Victim Mentality

Survival Mindset vs. Victim Mentality

0
After DoD’s $1.5B move, Army and Marines rush to buy new Javelins, Stingers

After DoD’s $1.5B move, Army and Marines rush to buy new Javelins, Stingers

May 6, 2022
A Littoral Combat Ship deploys to 6th Fleet for the first time

A Littoral Combat Ship deploys to 6th Fleet for the first time

May 6, 2022
For first time, France talks openly about sending weapons to Ukraine

For first time, France talks openly about sending weapons to Ukraine

May 5, 2022
Marines’ new aviation plan in the works: General – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

New Marine Corps aviation plan makes ‘digital interoperability’ a top priority

May 3, 2022

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • DMCA
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Whitelist

© 2021 All Rights Reserved survivalsociety.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Naval Survival
  • Land Survival
  • Survival Strategy
  • Defense

© 2021 All Rights Reserved survivalsociety.com